Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w16036 |
来源ID | Working Paper 16036 |
How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Non-Market Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature | |
Jonathan E. Alevy; John List; Wiktor Adamowicz | |
发表日期 | 2010-05-27 |
出版年 | 2010 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Psychological insights have made inroads within most major areas of study in economics. One area where less advance has been made is environmental and resource economics. In this study, we examine the implications of preference reversals over evaluation modes, in which stated economic values critically depend on whether the good is valued jointly with others or in isolation. The question arises because two commonly used methods for eliciting stated preferences differ in that one presents objects together and another presents objects to be evaluated in isolation. Beyond showing an example of the import of behavioral economics, our empirical evidence sheds new light on the factors associated with insensitivity of valuations to the scope of the good. |
主题 | Econometrics ; Experimental Design ; Environmental and Resource Economics ; Environment |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w16036 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/573711 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Jonathan E. Alevy,John List,Wiktor Adamowicz. How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Non-Market Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. 2010. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w16036.pdf(293KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。