G2TT
来源类型Paper
规范类型论文
Prioritizing Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform in the UNFCCC Process: Recommendations for short-term actions
Virginia Benninghoff; Kerryn Lang; Peter Wooders
发表日期2013-08
出版者IISD
出版年2013
页码8
语种英语
概述Though many Parties to the UNFCCC have noted the climate change mitigation benefits of fossil-fuel subsidy reform, it is time for Parties to...
摘要

Though many Parties to the UNFCCC have noted the climate change mitigation benefits of fossil-fuel subsidy reform, it is time for Parties to take engagement on this issue to the next level.

The negotiations are currently focused on two primary goals: (1) negotiating a protocol or other legal instrument to be signed in 2015 and take effect in 2020, and (2) increasing pre-2020 mitigation ambition to ensure UNFCCC Parties' emissions reduction pledges reach the necessary level to keep average temperatures from rising more than 2?C above pre-industrial levels.

Fossil-fuel subsidy reform can contribute significantly to this second goal—especially because it is a measure that is ready and available to be deployed today. Parties do not need to wait until an agreement is negotiated to take advantage of the UNFCCC forum and its various bodies to advance reform.

The GSI recommends that Parties to the UNFCCC:

This policy brief addresses the importance of fossil-fuel subsidy reform in the context of meeting global climate change mitigation goals, elaborates on the concrete actions Parties can take to progress reform, and describes how efforts under the auspices of the UNFCCC will complement similar work in other international forums.

  1. Propose options for addressing fossil-fuel subsidy reform under Workstream 2—for example, through technical workshops and discussions—in country submissions to the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP).
  2. Explore the possibility of developing fossil-fuel subsidy reform as a nationally appropriate mitigation action (NAMA). Interested developing countries can consider communicating to the Secretariat that they intend to implement fossil-fuel subsidy reform as a NAMA and request support.
  3. Raise fossil-fuel subsidy reform in submissions to the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA), requesting methodological issues related to reform be added to the agenda or discussed in a dedicated workshop.
  4. Include fossil-fuel subsidy reform on the agenda of the proposed ministerial meeting on energy efficiency and renewable energy at COP 19 in Warsaw, pointing out how it can reduce barriers to energy efficiency and renewable energy deployment.
  5. Voluntarily report on fossil-fuel subsidies and steps toward reform as part of national communications, biennial reports, and biennial update reports.
主题Subsidies
URLhttps://www.iisd.org/library/prioritizing-fossil-fuel-subsidy-reform-unfccc-process-recommendations-short-term-actions
来源智库International Institute for Sustainable Development (Canada)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/57376
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Virginia Benninghoff,Kerryn Lang,Peter Wooders. Prioritizing Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform in the UNFCCC Process: Recommendations for short-term actions. 2013.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Virginia Benninghoff]的文章
[Kerryn Lang]的文章
[Peter Wooders]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Virginia Benninghoff]的文章
[Kerryn Lang]的文章
[Peter Wooders]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Virginia Benninghoff]的文章
[Kerryn Lang]的文章
[Peter Wooders]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。