| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w16113 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 16113 |
| Twins or Strangers? Differences and Similarities between Industrial and Academic Science | |
| Henry Sauermann; Paula E. Stephan | |
| 发表日期 | 2010-06-17 |
| 出版年 | 2010 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Some scholars view academic and industrial science as qualitatively different knowledge production regimes. Others claim that the two sectors are increasingly similar. Large-scale empirical evidence regarding similarities and differences, however, has been missing. Drawing on prior work on the organization of science, we first develop a framework to compare and contrast the two sectors along four key dimensions: (1) the nature of research (e.g., basic versus applied); (2) organizational characteristics (e.g., degree of independence, pay); (3) researchers' preferences (e.g., taste for independence); and (4) the use of alternative disclosure mechanisms (e.g., patenting and publishing). We then compare the two sectors empirically using detailed survey data from a representative sample of over 5,000 life scientists and physical scientists employed in a wide range of academic institutions and private firms. Building on prior work that has emphasized different "research missions", we also examine how the nature of research is related to other characteristics of science within and across the two sectors. |
| 主题 | Labor Economics ; Labor Compensation ; Labor Market Structures ; Development and Growth ; Innovation and R& ; D |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w16113 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/573787 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Henry Sauermann,Paula E. Stephan. Twins or Strangers? Differences and Similarities between Industrial and Academic Science. 2010. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w16113.pdf（367KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
