| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w16179 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 16179 |
| How Do Employers React to A Pay-or-Play Mandate? Early Evidence from San Francisco | |
| Carrie Hoverman Colla; William H. Dow; Arindrajit Dube | |
| 发表日期 | 2010-07-08 |
| 出版年 | 2010 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | In 2006 San Francisco adopted major health reform, becoming the first city to implement a pay-or-play employer health spending mandate. It also created Healthy San Francisco, a "public option" to promote affordable universal access to care. Using the 2008 Bay Area Employer Health Benefits Survey, we find that most employers (75%) had to increase health spending to comply with the law, yet most (64%) are supportive of the law. There is substantial employer demand for the public option, with 21% of firms using Healthy San Francisco for at least some employees, yet there is little evidence of firms dropping existing insurance offerings in the first year after implementation. |
| 主题 | Health, Education, and Welfare ; Health |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w16179 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/573852 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Carrie Hoverman Colla,William H. Dow,Arindrajit Dube. How Do Employers React to A Pay-or-Play Mandate? Early Evidence from San Francisco. 2010. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w16179.pdf（269KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
