| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w16372 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 16372 |
| Is Crowding Out Due Entirely to Fundraising? Evidence from a Panel of Charities | |
| James Andreoni; A. Abigail Payne | |
| 发表日期 | 2010-09-16 |
| 出版年 | 2010 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | When the government gives a grant to a private charitable organization, do the donors to that organization give less? If they do, is it because the grants crowd out donors who feel they gave through taxes (classic crowd out), or is it because the grant crowds out the fund-raising of the charities who, after getting the grant, reduce efforts of fund-raising (fund-raising crowd out)? This is the first paper to separate these two effects. Using a panel of more than 8,000 charities, we find that crowding out is significant, at about 72 percent. We find this crowding out is due primarily to reduced fund-raising. Depending on which types of organizations are included in the analysis, crowding out attributable to classic crowd-out ranges from 30% to a slight crowd-in effect, while fund-raising crowd out ranges from 70% to over 100% of all crowd out. Such a finding could have important consequences for how governments structure grants to non-profits. Our results indicate, for example, that requirements that charities match a fraction of government grants with increases in private donations might be a feasible policy that could reduce the detrimental effects of crowding out. |
| 主题 | Public Economics ; Taxation ; Public Goods |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w16372 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/574047 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | James Andreoni,A. Abigail Payne. Is Crowding Out Due Entirely to Fundraising? Evidence from a Panel of Charities. 2010. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w16372.pdf（186KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
