Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w16667 |
来源ID | Working Paper 16667 |
Kosher Pork | |
Allan Drazen; Ethan Ilzetzki | |
发表日期 | 2011-01-06 |
出版年 | 2011 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Both conventional wisdom and leading academic research view pork barrel spending as antithetical to responsible policymaking in times of crisis. In this paper we present an alternative view. When agents are heterogeneous in their ideology and in their information about the economic situation, allocation of pork may enable passage of legislation appropriate to a "crisis" that might otherwise not pass. Pork "greases the legislative wheels" not by bribing legislators to accept legislation they view as harmful, but by conveying information about the necessity of policy change, where it may be impossible to convey such information in the absence of pork. Pork may be used for this function in situations where all legislators would agree to forgo pork under full information. Moreover, pork will be observed when the public good is most valuable precisely because it is valuable and the informed agenda setter wants to convey this information. |
主题 | Microeconomics ; Welfare and Collective Choice ; Macroeconomics ; Fiscal Policy ; Public Economics ; Public Goods |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w16667 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/574342 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Allan Drazen,Ethan Ilzetzki. Kosher Pork. 2011. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w16667.pdf(336KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Allan Drazen]的文章 |
[Ethan Ilzetzki]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Allan Drazen]的文章 |
[Ethan Ilzetzki]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Allan Drazen]的文章 |
[Ethan Ilzetzki]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。