| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w18116 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 18116 |
| NIH Peer Review: Challenges and Avenues for Reform | |
| Pierre Azoulay; Joshua S. Graff Zivin; Gustavo Manso | |
| 发表日期 | 2012-06-01 |
| 出版年 | 2012 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | The National Institute of Health (NIH), through its extramural grant program, is the primary public funder of health-related research in the United States. Peer review at NIH is organized around the twin principles of investigator initiation and rigorous peer review, and this combination has long been a model that science funding agencies throughout the world seek to emulate. However, lean budgets and the rapidly changing ecosystem within which scientific inquiry takes place have led many to ask whether the peer-review practices inherited from the immediate post-war era are still well-suited to twenty first century realities. In this essay, we examine two salient issues: (1) the aging of the scientist population supported by NIH and (2) the innovativeness of the research supported by the institutes. We identify potential avenues for reform as well as a means for implementing and evaluating them. |
| 主题 | Development and Growth ; Innovation and R& ; D |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w18116 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/575792 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Pierre Azoulay,Joshua S. Graff Zivin,Gustavo Manso. NIH Peer Review: Challenges and Avenues for Reform. 2012. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w18116.pdf（251KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
