| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w18294 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 18294 |
| The Impact of Right to Carry Laws and the NRC Report: The Latest Lessons for the Empirical Evaluation of Law and Policy | |
| Abhay Aneja; John J. Donohue III; Alexandria Zhang | |
| 发表日期 | 2012-08-17 |
| 出版年 | 2012 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | For over a decade, there has been a spirited academic debate over the impact on crime of laws that grant citizens the presumptive right to carry concealed handguns in public – so-called right-to-carry (RTC) laws. In 2004, the National Research Council (NRC) offered a critical evaluation of the “More Guns, Less Crime” hypothesis using county-level crime data for the period 1977-2000. 15 of the 16 academic members of the NRC panel essentially concluded that the existing research was inadequate to conclude that RTC laws increased or decreased crime. One member of the panel thought the NRC's panel data regressions showed that RTC laws decreased murder, but the other 15 responded by saying that “the scientific evidence does not support” that position. |
| 主题 | Other ; Law and Economics |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w18294 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/575969 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Abhay Aneja,John J. Donohue III,Alexandria Zhang. The Impact of Right to Carry Laws and the NRC Report: The Latest Lessons for the Empirical Evaluation of Law and Policy. 2012. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w18294.pdf（2892KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
