G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型报告
DOI10.3386/w18992
来源IDWorking Paper 18992
Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation?
Betsey Stevenson; Justin Wolfers
发表日期2013-04-25
出版年2013
语种英语
摘要Many scholars have argued that once "basic needs" have been met, higher income is no longer associated with higher in subjective well-being. We assess the validity of this claim in comparisons of both rich and poor countries, and also of rich and poor people within a country. Analyzing multiple datasets, multiple definitions of "basic needs" and multiple questions about well-being, we find no support for this claim. The relationship between well-being and income is roughly linear-log and does not diminish as incomes rise. If there is a satiation point, we are yet to reach it.
主题Microeconomics ; Welfare and Collective Choice ; Health, Education, and Welfare ; Poverty and Wellbeing ; History ; Labor and Health History ; Development and Growth ; Development ; Growth and Productivity
URLhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w18992
来源智库National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/576666
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Betsey Stevenson,Justin Wolfers. Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation?. 2013.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Betsey Stevenson]的文章
[Justin Wolfers]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Betsey Stevenson]的文章
[Justin Wolfers]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Betsey Stevenson]的文章
[Justin Wolfers]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。