Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w19114 |
来源ID | Working Paper 19114 |
Updating Beliefs with Ambiguous Evidence: Implications for Polarization | |
Roland G. Fryer, Jr.; Philipp Harms; Matthew O. Jackson | |
发表日期 | 2013-06-06 |
出版年 | 2013 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We introduce and analyze a model in which agents observe sequences of signals about the state of the world, some of which are ambiguous and open to interpretation. Instead of using Bayes' rule on the whole sequence, our decision makers use Bayes' rule in an iterative way: first to interpret each signal and then to form a posterior on the whole sequence of interpreted signals. This technique is computationally efficient, but loses some information since only the interpretation of the signals is retained and not the full signal. We show that such rules are optimal if agents sufficiently discount the future; while if they are very patient then a time-varying random interpretation rule becomes optimal. One of our main contributions is showing that the model provides a formal foundation for why agents who observe exactly the same stream of information can end up becoming increasingly polarized in their posteriors. |
主题 | Microeconomics ; Behavioral Economics ; Labor Economics |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w19114 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/576789 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Roland G. Fryer, Jr.,Philipp Harms,Matthew O. Jackson. Updating Beliefs with Ambiguous Evidence: Implications for Polarization. 2013. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。