Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w19392 |
来源ID | Working Paper 19392 |
On Measuring Time Preferences | |
James Andreoni; Michael A. Kuhn; Charles Sprenger | |
发表日期 | 2013-08-29 |
出版年 | 2013 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Eliciting time preferences has become an important component of both laboratory and field experiments, yet there is no consensus as how to best measure discounting. We examine the predictive validity of two recent, simple, easily administered, and individually successful elicitation tools: Convex Time Budgets (CTB) and Double Multiple Price Lists (DMPL). Using similar methods, the CTB and DMPL are compared using within- and out-of-sample predictions. While each perform equally well within sample, the CTB significantly outperforms the DMPL on out-of-sample measures. |
主题 | Microeconomics ; Behavioral Economics ; Households and Firms |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w19392 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/577067 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | James Andreoni,Michael A. Kuhn,Charles Sprenger. On Measuring Time Preferences. 2013. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。