G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型报告
DOI10.3386/w19406
来源IDWorking Paper 19406
Are Tenure Track Professors Better Teachers?
David N. Figlio; Morton O. Schapiro; Kevin B. Soter
发表日期2013-09-05
出版年2013
语种英语
摘要This study makes use of detailed student-level data from eight cohorts of first-year students at Northwestern University to investigate the relative effects of tenure track/tenured versus non-tenure line faculty on student learning. We focus on classes taken during a student's first term at Northwestern, and employ a unique identification strategy in which we control for both student-level fixed effects and next-class-taken fixed effects to measure the degree to which non-tenure line faculty contribute more or less to lasting student learning than do other faculty. We find consistent evidence that students learn relatively more from non-tenure line professors in their introductory courses. These differences are present across a wide variety of subject areas, and are particularly pronounced for Northwestern's average students and less-qualified students.
主题Health, Education, and Welfare ; Education
URLhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w19406
来源智库National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/577081
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
David N. Figlio,Morton O. Schapiro,Kevin B. Soter. Are Tenure Track Professors Better Teachers?. 2013.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[David N. Figlio]的文章
[Morton O. Schapiro]的文章
[Kevin B. Soter]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[David N. Figlio]的文章
[Morton O. Schapiro]的文章
[Kevin B. Soter]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[David N. Figlio]的文章
[Morton O. Schapiro]的文章
[Kevin B. Soter]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。