Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w19458 |
来源ID | Working Paper 19458 |
Private Equity, Jobs, and Productivity | |
Steven J. Davis; John C. Haltiwanger; Kyle Handley; Ron S. Jarmin; Josh Lerner; Javier Miranda | |
发表日期 | 2013-09-19 |
出版年 | 2013 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Private equity critics claim that leveraged buyouts bring huge job losses and few gains in operating performance. To evaluate these claims, we construct and analyze a new dataset that covers U.S. buyouts from 1980 to 2005. We track 3,200 target firms and their 150,000 establishments before and after acquisition, comparing them to controls defined by industry, size, age, and prior growth. Relative to controls, employment at target establishments falls 3 percent over two years post buyout and 6 percent over five years. However, target firms also create more new jobs at new establishments, and they acquire and divest establishments more rapidly. Considering all adjustment margins, relative net job loss at target firms is a modest one percent of employment over two years post buyout. In contrast, the sum of gross job creation and destruction at target firms exceeds that of controls by 14 percent of employment over two years. Buyouts also bring TFP gains at target firms and reductions in earnings per worker. Productivity gains arise mainly from an accelerated exit of less productive establishments and greater entry of more productive ones - that is, from a directed reallocation of jobs within target firms. |
主题 | Microeconomics ; Households and Firms ; Labor Economics ; Labor Compensation ; Unemployment and Immigration |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w19458 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/577132 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Steven J. Davis,John C. Haltiwanger,Kyle Handley,et al. Private Equity, Jobs, and Productivity. 2013. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。