G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型报告
DOI10.3386/w19471
来源IDWorking Paper 19471
Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination
Jan Feld; Nicolás Salamanca; Daniel S. Hamermesh
发表日期2013-09-26
出版年2013
语种英语
摘要The immense literature on discrimination treats outcomes as relative: One group suffers compared to another. But does a difference arise because agents discriminate against others--are exophobic--or because they favor their own kind--are endophilic? This difference matters, as the relative importance of the types of discrimination and their inter-relation affect market outcomes. Using a field experiment in which graders at one university were randomly assigned students' exams that did or did not contain the students' names, on average we find favoritism but no discrimination by nationality, and neither favoritism nor discrimination by gender, findings that are robust to a wide variety of potential concerns. We observe heterogeneity in both discrimination and favoritism by nationality and by gender in the distributions of graders' preferences. We show that a changing correlation between endophilia and exophobia can generate perverse changes in observed market discrimination.
主题Other ; History of Economic Thought ; Health, Education, and Welfare ; Education ; Labor Economics ; Labor Discrimination
URLhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w19471
来源智库National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/577145
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Jan Feld,Nicolás Salamanca,Daniel S. Hamermesh. Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination. 2013.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Jan Feld]的文章
[Nicolás Salamanca]的文章
[Daniel S. Hamermesh]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Jan Feld]的文章
[Nicolás Salamanca]的文章
[Daniel S. Hamermesh]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Jan Feld]的文章
[Nicolás Salamanca]的文章
[Daniel S. Hamermesh]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。