G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型报告
DOI10.3386/w19984
来源IDWorking Paper 19984
Why Do Banks Practice Regulatory Arbitrage? Evidence from Usage of Trust Preferred Securities
Nicole Boyson; Rüdiger Fahlenbrach; René M. Stulz
发表日期2014-03-20
出版年2014
语种英语
摘要We propose a theory of regulatory arbitrage by banks and test it using trust preferred securities (TPS) issuance. From 1996 to 2007, U.S. banks in the aggregate increased their regulatory capital through issuance of TPS while their net issuance of common stock was negative due to repurchases. We assume that, in the absence of capital requirements, a bank has an optimal capital structure that depends on its business model. Capital requirements can impose constraints on bank decisions. If a bank's optimal capital structure also meets regulatory capital requirements with a sufficient buffer, the bank is unconstrained by these requirements. We expect that unconstrained banks will not issue TPS, that constrained banks will issue TPS and engage in other forms of regulatory arbitrage, and that banks with TPS will be riskier than other banks with the same amount of regulatory capital, and therefore, more adversely affected by the credit crisis. Our empirical evidence supports these predictions.
主题Financial Economics ; Financial Institutions
URLhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w19984
来源智库National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/577658
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Nicole Boyson,Rüdiger Fahlenbrach,René M. Stulz. Why Do Banks Practice Regulatory Arbitrage? Evidence from Usage of Trust Preferred Securities. 2014.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Nicole Boyson]的文章
[Rüdiger Fahlenbrach]的文章
[René M. Stulz]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Nicole Boyson]的文章
[Rüdiger Fahlenbrach]的文章
[René M. Stulz]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Nicole Boyson]的文章
[Rüdiger Fahlenbrach]的文章
[René M. Stulz]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。