Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w19984 |
来源ID | Working Paper 19984 |
Why Do Banks Practice Regulatory Arbitrage? Evidence from Usage of Trust Preferred Securities | |
Nicole Boyson; Rüdiger Fahlenbrach; René M. Stulz | |
发表日期 | 2014-03-20 |
出版年 | 2014 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We propose a theory of regulatory arbitrage by banks and test it using trust preferred securities (TPS) issuance. From 1996 to 2007, U.S. banks in the aggregate increased their regulatory capital through issuance of TPS while their net issuance of common stock was negative due to repurchases. We assume that, in the absence of capital requirements, a bank has an optimal capital structure that depends on its business model. Capital requirements can impose constraints on bank decisions. If a bank's optimal capital structure also meets regulatory capital requirements with a sufficient buffer, the bank is unconstrained by these requirements. We expect that unconstrained banks will not issue TPS, that constrained banks will issue TPS and engage in other forms of regulatory arbitrage, and that banks with TPS will be riskier than other banks with the same amount of regulatory capital, and therefore, more adversely affected by the credit crisis. Our empirical evidence supports these predictions. |
主题 | Financial Economics ; Financial Institutions |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w19984 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/577658 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Nicole Boyson,Rüdiger Fahlenbrach,René M. Stulz. Why Do Banks Practice Regulatory Arbitrage? Evidence from Usage of Trust Preferred Securities. 2014. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。