G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型报告
DOI10.3386/w20181
来源IDWorking Paper 20181
Dominated Choices and Medicare Advantage Enrollment
Christopher Afendulis; Anna Sinaiko; Richard Frank
发表日期2014-05-29
出版年2014
语种英语
摘要Research in behavioral economics suggests that certain circumstances, such as large numbers of complex options or revisiting prior choices, can lead to decision errors. This paper explores the enrollment decisions of Medicare beneficiaries in the Medicare Advantage (MA) program. During the time period we study (2007-2010), private fee-for-service (PFFS) plans offered enhanced benefits beyond those of traditional Medicare (TM) without any restrictions on physician networks or additional cost, making TM a dominated choice relative to PFFS. Yet more than three quarters of Medicare beneficiaries remained in TM during our study period. We explore two possible explanations for this behavior: status quo bias and choice overload. Our results suggest that status quo bias plays an important role; the rate of MA enrollment was significantly higher among new Medicare beneficiaries than among incumbents. Our results also provide some evidence of choice overload; while the MA enrollment rate did not decline with an increase in the number of plans, among incumbent beneficiaries it failed to increase. Our results illustrate the importance of the choice environment that is in place when enrollees first enter the Medicare program.
主题Health, Education, and Welfare ; Health
URLhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w20181
来源智库National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/577854
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Christopher Afendulis,Anna Sinaiko,Richard Frank. Dominated Choices and Medicare Advantage Enrollment. 2014.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Christopher Afendulis]的文章
[Anna Sinaiko]的文章
[Richard Frank]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Christopher Afendulis]的文章
[Anna Sinaiko]的文章
[Richard Frank]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Christopher Afendulis]的文章
[Anna Sinaiko]的文章
[Richard Frank]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。