全球智库信息集成服务系统(G2TT): Efficacy vs. Equity: What Happens When States Tinker with College Admissions in a Race-Blind Era?

G2TT

来源类型	Working Paper
规范类型	报告
DOI	10.3386/w20804
来源ID	Working Paper 20804
	Efficacy vs. Equity: What Happens When States Tinker with College Admissions in a Race-Blind Era?
	Sandra E. Black; Kalena E. Cortes; Jane Arnold Lincove
发表日期	2015-01-05
出版年	2015
语种	英语
摘要	College admissions officers face a rapidly changing policy environment where court decisions have limited the use of affirmative action. At the same time, there is mounting evidence that commonly used signals of college readiness, such as the SAT/ACTs, are subject to race and socioeconomic bias. Our study investigates the efficacy and equity of college admissions criteria by estimating the effect of multiple measures of college readiness on freshman college grade point average and four-year graduation. Importantly, we take advantage of a unique institutional feature of the Texas higher education system to control for selection into admissions and enrollment. We find that SAT/ACT scores, high school exit exams, and advanced coursework are predictors of student success in college. However, when we simulate changes in college enrollment and college outcomes with additional admissions criteria, we find that adding SAT/ACT or high school exit exam criteria to a rank-based admissions policy significantly decreases enrollment among minorities and other groups, with the most negative effects generated by the SAT/ACT, while inducing only minimal gains in college GPA and four-year graduation rates.
主题	Health, Education, and Welfare ; Education ; Labor Economics ; Demography and Aging
URL	https://www.nber.org/papers/w20804
来源智库	National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型	智库出版物
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/578477
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Sandra E. Black,Kalena E. Cortes,Jane Arnold Lincove. Efficacy vs. Equity: What Happens When States Tinker with College Admissions in a Race-Blind Era?. 2015.