| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w21357 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 21357 |
| Why the Referential Treatment: Evidence from Field Experiments on Referrals | |
| Amanda Pallais; Emily Glassberg Sands | |
| 发表日期 | 2015-07-13 |
| 出版年 | 2015 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Referred workers are more likely than non-referred workers to be hired, all else equal. In three field experiments in an online labor market, we examine why. We find that referrals contain positive information about worker performance and persistence that is not contained in workers' observable characteristics. We also find that referrals performed particularly well when working directly with their referrers. However, we do not find evidence that referrals exert more effort because they believe their performance will affect their relationship with their referrer or their referrer's position at the firm. |
| 主题 | Econometrics ; Experimental Design ; Labor Economics ; Labor Supply and Demand ; Unemployment and Immigration ; Other ; Accounting, Marketing, and Personnel |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w21357 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/579029 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Amanda Pallais,Emily Glassberg Sands. Why the Referential Treatment: Evidence from Field Experiments on Referrals. 2015. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
