Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w21474 |
来源ID | Working Paper 21474 |
Self Control and Commitment: Can Decreasing the Liquidity of a Savings Account Increase Deposits? | |
John Beshears; James J. Choi; Christopher Harris; David Laibson; Brigitte C. Madrian; Jung Sakong | |
发表日期 | 2015-08-24 |
出版年 | 2015 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | If individuals have self-control problems, they may take up commitment contracts that restrict their spending. We experimentally investigate how contract design affects the demand for commitment contracts. Each participant divides money between a liquid account, which permits unrestricted withdrawals, and a commitment account with withdrawal restrictions that are randomized across participants. When the two accounts pay the same interest rate, the most illiquid commitment account attracts more money than any of the other commitment accounts. We show theoretically that this pattern is consistent with the presence of sophisticated present-biased agents, who prefer more illiquid commitment accounts even if they are subject to uninsurable marginal utility shocks drawn from a broad class of distributions. When the commitment account pays a higher interest rate than the liquid account, the relationship between illiquidity and deposits is flat, suggesting that agents without present bias and/or naïve present-biased agents are also present in our sample. |
主题 | Microeconomics ; Behavioral Economics ; Households and Firms |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w21474 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/579149 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | John Beshears,James J. Choi,Christopher Harris,et al. Self Control and Commitment: Can Decreasing the Liquidity of a Savings Account Increase Deposits?. 2015. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。