G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型报告
DOI10.3386/w21579
来源IDWorking Paper 21579
Neophilia Ranking of Scientific Journals
Mikko Packalen; Jay Bhattacharya
发表日期2015-09-21
出版年2015
语种英语
摘要The ranking of scientific journals is important because of the signal it sends to scientists about what is considered most vital for scientific progress. Existing ranking systems focus on measuring the influence of a scientific paper (citations)—these rankings do not reward journals for publishing innovative work that builds on new ideas. We propose an alternative ranking based on the proclivity of journals to publish papers that build on new ideas, and we implement this ranking via a text-based analysis of all published biomedical papers dating back to 1946. Our results show that our neophilia ranking is distinct from citation-based rankings. Prior theoretical work suggests an active role for our neophilia index in science policy. Absent an explicit incentive to pursue novel science, scientists under-invest in innovative work because of a coordination problem: for work on a new idea to flourish, many scientists must decide to adopt it in their work. Rankings that are based purely on influence thus do not provide sufficient incentives for publishing innovative work. By contrast, adoption of the neophilia index as part of journal-ranking procedures by funding agencies and university administrators would provide an explicit incentive for journals to publish innovative work and thus help solve the coordination problem by increasing scientists’ incentives to pursue innovative work.
主题Health, Education, and Welfare ; Health ; Development and Growth ; Innovation and R& ; D
URLhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w21579
来源智库National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/579254
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Mikko Packalen,Jay Bhattacharya. Neophilia Ranking of Scientific Journals. 2015.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Mikko Packalen]的文章
[Jay Bhattacharya]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Mikko Packalen]的文章
[Jay Bhattacharya]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Mikko Packalen]的文章
[Jay Bhattacharya]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。