Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w21705 |
来源ID | Working Paper 21705 |
Research Design Meets Market Design: Using Centralized Assignment for Impact Evaluation | |
Atila Abdulkadiroglu; Joshua D. Angrist; Yusuke Narita; Parag A. Pathak | |
发表日期 | 2015-11-09 |
出版年 | 2015 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | A growing number of school districts use centralized assignment mechanisms to allocate school seats in a manner that reflects student preferences and school priorities. Many of these assignment schemes use lotteries to ration seats when schools are oversubscribed. The resulting random assignment opens the door to credible quasi-experimental research designs for the evaluation of school effectiveness. Yet the question of how best to separate the lottery-generated variation integral to such designs from non-random preferences and priorities remains open. This paper develops easily-implemented empirical strategies that fully exploit the random assignment embedded in the widely-used deferred acceptance mechanism and its variants. We use these methods to evaluate charter schools in Denver, one of a growing number of districts that integrate charter and traditional public schools in a unified assignment system. The resulting estimates show large achievement gains from charter school attendance. Our approach expands the scope for impact evaluation by maximizing the number of students and schools that can be studied using random assignment. We also show how to use DA to identify causal effects in models with multiple school sectors. |
主题 | Econometrics ; Estimation Methods ; Microeconomics ; Market Structure and Distribution ; Health, Education, and Welfare ; Education |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w21705 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/579380 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Atila Abdulkadiroglu,Joshua D. Angrist,Yusuke Narita,et al. Research Design Meets Market Design: Using Centralized Assignment for Impact Evaluation. 2015. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。