G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型报告
DOI10.3386/w22194
来源IDWorking Paper 22194
Are Settlements in Patent Litigation Collusive? Evidence from Paragraph IV Challenges
Eric Helland; Seth A. Seabury
发表日期2016-05-02
出版年2016
语种英语
摘要The use of “pay-for-delay” settlements in patent litigation – in which a branded manufacturer and generic entrant settle a Paragraph IV patent challenge and agree to forestall entry – has come under considerable scrutiny in recent years. Critics argue that these settlements are collusive and lower consumer welfare by maintaining monopoly prices after patents should have expired, while proponents argue they reinforce incentives for innovation. We estimate the impact of settlements to Paragraph IV challenges on generic entry and evaluate the implications for drug prices and quantity. To address the potential endogeneity of Paragraph IV challenges and settlements we estimate the model using instrumental variables. Our instruments include standard measures of patent strength and a measure of settlement legality based on a split between several Circuit Courts of Appeal. We find that Paragraph IV challenges increase generic entry, lower drug prices and increase quantity, while settlements effectively reverse the effect. These effects persist over time, inflating price and depressing quantity for up to 5 years after the challenge. We also find that eliminating settlements would result in a relatively small reduction in research and development (R&D) expenditures.
主题Health, Education, and Welfare ; Health ; Other ; Law and Economics
URLhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w22194
来源智库National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/579868
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Eric Helland,Seth A. Seabury. Are Settlements in Patent Litigation Collusive? Evidence from Paragraph IV Challenges. 2016.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
w22194.pdf(1001KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Eric Helland]的文章
[Seth A. Seabury]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Eric Helland]的文章
[Seth A. Seabury]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Eric Helland]的文章
[Seth A. Seabury]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: w22194.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。