| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w22462 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 22462 |
| Popular Acceptance of Inequality due to Brute Luck and Support for Classical Benefit-Based Taxation | |
| Matthew Weinzierl | |
| 发表日期 | 2016-08-01 |
| 出版年 | 2016 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | U.S. survey respondents’ views on distributive justice are shown to differ in two specific, related ways from what is conventionally assumed in modern optimal tax research. A large share of respondents, and in some cases a large majority, resist the full equalization of inequality due to brute luck that standard analyses would recommend. Related, a similar share prefer a classical benefit-based logic for the assignment of taxes over the conventional logic of diminishing marginal social welfare. Moreover, these two views are linked: respondents who more strongly resist equalization are more likely to prefer the classical benefit-based principle. Together, these results suggest that a large share of the American public views the allocation of pre-tax incomes as relevant to optimal tax policy and—at least in part—justly deserved unless proven otherwise, judgments that are inconsistent with standard welfarist objectives. |
| 主题 | Microeconomics ; Welfare and Collective Choice ; Public Economics ; Taxation |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w22462 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/580136 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Matthew Weinzierl. Popular Acceptance of Inequality due to Brute Luck and Support for Classical Benefit-Based Taxation. 2016. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w22462.pdf（255KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Matthew Weinzierl]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Matthew Weinzierl]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Matthew Weinzierl]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
