Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w22526 |
来源ID | Working Paper 22526 |
How Do Voters Matter? Evidence from US Congressional Redistricting | |
Daniel B. Jones; Randall Walsh | |
发表日期 | 2016-08-22 |
出版年 | 2016 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | How does the partisan composition of an electorate impact the policies adopted by an elected representative? We take advantage of variation in the partisan composition of Congressional districts stemming from Census-initiated redistricting in the 1990’s, 2000’s, and 2010’s. Using this variation, we examine how an increase in Democrat share within a district impacts the district representative’s roll call voting. We find that an increase in Democrat share within a district causes more leftist roll call voting. This occurs because a Democrat is more likely to hold the seat, but also because – in contrast to existing empirical work – partisan composition has a direct effect on the roll call voting of individual representatives. This is true of both Democrats and Republicans. It is also true regardless of the nature of the redistricting (e.g., whether the redistricting was generated by a partisan or non-partisan process). |
主题 | Microeconomics ; Welfare and Collective Choice ; Public Economics |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w22526 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/580200 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Daniel B. Jones,Randall Walsh. How Do Voters Matter? Evidence from US Congressional Redistricting. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w22526.pdf(4377KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Daniel B. Jones]的文章 |
[Randall Walsh]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Daniel B. Jones]的文章 |
[Randall Walsh]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Daniel B. Jones]的文章 |
[Randall Walsh]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。