| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w22588 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 22588 |
| Voter Response to Peak and End Transfers: Evidence from a Conditional Cash Transfer Experiment | |
| Sebastian Galiani; Nadya Hajj; Patrick J. McEwan; Pablo Ibarraran; Nandita Krishnaswamy | |
| 发表日期 | 2016-09-01 |
| 出版年 | 2016 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | In a Honduran field experiment, sequences of cash transfers to poor households varied in amount of the largest (“peak”) and last (“end”) transfers. Larger peak-end transfers increased voter turnout and the incumbent party’s vote share in the 2013 presidential election, independently of cumulative transfers. A plausible explanation is that voters succumbed to a common cognitive bias by applying peak-end heuristics. Another is that voters deliberately used peak-end transfers to update beliefs about the incumbent party. In either case, the results provide experimental evidence on the classic non-experimental finding that voters are especially sensitive to recent economic activity. |
| 主题 | Public Economics ; Taxation ; Health, Education, and Welfare ; Poverty and Wellbeing |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w22588 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/580262 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Sebastian Galiani,Nadya Hajj,Patrick J. McEwan,et al. Voter Response to Peak and End Transfers: Evidence from a Conditional Cash Transfer Experiment. 2016. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w22588.pdf（880KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
