| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w22632 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 22632 |
| Efficiency-Morality Trade-Offs in Repugnant Transactions: A Choice Experiment | |
| Julio J. Elias; Nicola Lacetera; Mario Macis | |
| 发表日期 | 2016-09-12 |
| 出版年 | 2016 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Societies prohibit many transactions considered morally repugnant, although potentially efficiency-enhancing. We conducted an online choice experiment to characterize preferences for the morality and efficiency of payments to kidney donors. Preferences were heterogeneous, ranging from deontological to strongly consequentialist; the median respondent would support payments by a public agency if they increased the annual kidney supply by six percentage points, and private transactions for a thirty percentage-point increase. Fairness concerns drive this difference. Our findings suggest that cost-benefit considerations affect the acceptance of morally controversial transactions, and imply that trial studies of the effects of payments would inform the public debate. |
| 主题 | Econometrics ; Experimental Design ; Microeconomics ; Market Structure and Distribution ; Welfare and Collective Choice ; Health, Education, and Welfare ; Health ; Other ; Law and Economics ; Culture |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w22632 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/580305 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Julio J. Elias,Nicola Lacetera,Mario Macis. Efficiency-Morality Trade-Offs in Repugnant Transactions: A Choice Experiment. 2016. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w22632.pdf（8927KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
