G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型报告
DOI10.3386/w22632
来源IDWorking Paper 22632
Efficiency-Morality Trade-Offs in Repugnant Transactions: A Choice Experiment
Julio J. Elias; Nicola Lacetera; Mario Macis
发表日期2016-09-12
出版年2016
语种英语
摘要Societies prohibit many transactions considered morally repugnant, although potentially efficiency-enhancing. We conducted an online choice experiment to characterize preferences for the morality and efficiency of payments to kidney donors. Preferences were heterogeneous, ranging from deontological to strongly consequentialist; the median respondent would support payments by a public agency if they increased the annual kidney supply by six percentage points, and private transactions for a thirty percentage-point increase. Fairness concerns drive this difference. Our findings suggest that cost-benefit considerations affect the acceptance of morally controversial transactions, and imply that trial studies of the effects of payments would inform the public debate.
主题Econometrics ; Experimental Design ; Microeconomics ; Market Structure and Distribution ; Welfare and Collective Choice ; Health, Education, and Welfare ; Health ; Other ; Law and Economics ; Culture
URLhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w22632
来源智库National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/580305
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Julio J. Elias,Nicola Lacetera,Mario Macis. Efficiency-Morality Trade-Offs in Repugnant Transactions: A Choice Experiment. 2016.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
w22632.pdf(8927KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Julio J. Elias]的文章
[Nicola Lacetera]的文章
[Mario Macis]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Julio J. Elias]的文章
[Nicola Lacetera]的文章
[Mario Macis]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Julio J. Elias]的文章
[Nicola Lacetera]的文章
[Mario Macis]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: w22632.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。