| 来源类型 | Working Paper
|
| 规范类型 | 报告
|
| DOI | 10.3386/w22818
|
| 来源ID | Working Paper 22818
|
| Technical Aspects of Correspondence Studies |
| Joanna Lahey; Ryan Beasley
|
| 发表日期 | 2016-11-14
|
| 出版年 | 2016
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | This paper discusses technical concerns and choices that arise when crafting a correspondence or audit study using external validity as a motivating framework. We will discuss resume creation, including power analysis, choice of inputs, pros and cons of matching pairs, solutions to the limited template problem, and ensuring that instruments indicate what the experimenters want them to indicate. Further topics about implementation include when and for how long to field a study, deciding on a participant pool, and whether or not to use replacement from the participant pool. More technical topics include matching outcomes to inputs, data storage, and analysis issues such as when to use clustering, when not to use fixed effects, and how to measure heterogeneous and interactive effects. We end with a technical checklist that experimenters can utilize prior to fielding a correspondence study. |
| 主题 | Econometrics
; Experimental Design
; Labor Economics
; Labor Discrimination
|
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w22818
|
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
|
| 引用统计 |
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/580492
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Joanna Lahey,Ryan Beasley. Technical Aspects of Correspondence Studies. 2016.
|
|
文件名：
|
w22818.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
