Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w22886 |
来源ID | Working Paper 22886 |
The Behavioralist as Policy Designer: The Need to Test Multiple Treatments to Meet Multiple Targets | |
Robert Hahn; Robert D. Metcalfe; David Novgorodsky; Michael K. Price | |
发表日期 | 2016-12-05 |
出版年 | 2016 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We explore Tinbergen’s fundamental insight that policymakers need at least as many policy instruments as targets. We extend this idea using a large natural field experiment in water resource management. We use social comparisons and loss-framed messages to help achieve two goals of our partner utility: getting consumers to purchase drought-resistant plants and reducing water use. Our results show that seemingly related behavioral instruments can affect different household decisions. By themselves, social comparisons and loss framing have no significant impact on the number of rebate requests; when combined, however, they lead to a 36% increase in requests. Only loss framing leads to a significant increase in the purchase of drought-resistant plants, and only the social comparison reduces water consumption. These results highlight the importance of testing different combinations of instruments, particularly when policymakers have multiple goals and the relationship between instruments and goals is uncertain. |
主题 | Econometrics ; Experimental Design ; Microeconomics ; Households and Firms ; Public Economics ; Public Goods ; Environmental and Resource Economics ; Renewable Resources |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w22886 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/580560 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Robert Hahn,Robert D. Metcalfe,David Novgorodsky,et al. The Behavioralist as Policy Designer: The Need to Test Multiple Treatments to Meet Multiple Targets. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w22886.pdf(464KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。