| 来源类型 | Working Paper
|
| 规范类型 | 报告
|
| DOI | 10.3386/w23337
|
| 来源ID | Working Paper 23337
|
| Queens |
| Oeindrila Dube; S.P. Harish
|
| 发表日期 | 2017-04-24
|
| 出版年 | 2017
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | Are states led by women less prone to conflict than states led by men? We answer this question by examining the effect of female rule on war among European polities over the 15th-20th centuries. We utilize gender of the first born and presence of a female sibling among previous monarchs as instruments for queenly rule. We find that polities led by queens were more likely to engage in war than polities led by kings. Moreover, the tendency of queens to engage as aggressors varied by marital status. Among unmarried monarchs, queens were more likely to be attacked than kings. Among married monarchs, queens were more likely to participate as attackers than kings, and, more likely to fight alongside allies. These results are consistent with an account in which marriages strengthened queenly reigns because married queens were more likely to secure alliances and enlist their spouses to help them rule. Married kings, in contrast, were less inclined to utilize a similar division of labor. These asymmetries, which reflected prevailing gender norms, ultimately enabled queens to pursue more aggressive war policies. |
| 主题 | Microeconomics
; Welfare and Collective Choice
; International Economics
; Globalization and International Relations
; Public Economics
; National Fiscal Issues
; Labor Economics
; Demography and Aging
; History
; Other History
|
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w23337
|
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
|
| 引用统计 |
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/581011
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Oeindrila Dube,S.P. Harish. Queens. 2017.
|
|
文件名：
|
w23337.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
