Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w23341 |
来源ID | Working Paper 23341 |
Precaution Versus Mercantilism: Reserve Accumulation, Capital Controls, and the Real Exchange Rate | |
Woo Jin Choi; Alan M. Taylor | |
发表日期 | 2017-04-24 |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We document a new international stylized fact describing the relationship between real exchange rates and external asset holdings. Economists have long argued that the real exchange rate is associated with the net international investment position, appreciating as external wealth increases. This mechanism has been seen as central for international payments equilibrium and relative price adjustments. However, we argue that the effect of external assets held by the public sector—reserve accumulation—on real exchange rates may be quite different from that of privately held external assets, and that capital controls are a critical factor behind this difference. For 1975–2007, controlling for GDP per capita and the terms of trade, we find that a one percentage point increase in external assets relative to GDP (net of reserves) is related to an 0.24 percent real exchange rate appreciation. On the contrary, a one percentage point increase in reserve accumulation relative to GDP has virtually no effect on the real exchange rate in financially open countries (low capital controls), and is related to a 1.65 percent real exchange rate depreciation in financially closed countries (high capital controls). Results are stronger in developing countries and in more recent periods. Gross rather than net positions matter and we present a new theoretical model to account for the stylized fact. The framework encompasses so-called precautionary and mercantilist motives for reserve accumulation, and also explains how the optimal capital account policy—the mix of reserve accumulation and capital controls—is determined. Further empirical support arises from evidence that reserve accumulation is associated with a trade surplus, along with higher GDP and TFP growth in countries with high capital controls, findings that are consistent with the mechanisms of our model. |
主题 | International Economics ; International Finance ; International Macroeconomics ; Development and Growth |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w23341 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/581015 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Woo Jin Choi,Alan M. Taylor. Precaution Versus Mercantilism: Reserve Accumulation, Capital Controls, and the Real Exchange Rate. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w23341.pdf(530KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Woo Jin Choi]的文章 |
[Alan M. Taylor]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Woo Jin Choi]的文章 |
[Alan M. Taylor]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Woo Jin Choi]的文章 |
[Alan M. Taylor]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。