| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w24249 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 24249 |
| Do Management Interventions Last? Evidence from India | |
| Nicholas Bloom; Aprajit Mahajan; David McKenzie; John Roberts | |
| 发表日期 | 2018-01-29 |
| 出版年 | 2018 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Beginning in 2008, we ran a randomized controlled trial that changed management practices in a set of Indian weaving firms (Bloom et al. 2013). In 2017 we revisited the plants and found three main results. First, while about half of the management practices adopted in the original experimental plants had been dropped, there was still a large and significant gap in practices between the treatment and control plants. Likewise, there remained a significant performance gap between treatment and control plants, suggesting lasting impacts of effective management interventions. Second, while few management practices had demonstrably spread across the firms in the study, many had spread within firms, from the experimental plants to the non-experimental plants, suggesting limited spillovers between firms but large spillovers within firms. Third, managerial turnover and the lack of Director time were two of the most cited reasons for the drop in management practices in experimental plants, highlighting the importance of key employees. |
| 主题 | Other ; Accounting, Marketing, and Personnel ; Development and Growth ; Development |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w24249 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/581923 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Nicholas Bloom,Aprajit Mahajan,David McKenzie,et al. Do Management Interventions Last? Evidence from India. 2018. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w24249.pdf（319KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
