| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w24703 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 24703 |
| The Rationale for Motions in the Design of Adjudication | |
| Steven Shavell | |
| 发表日期 | 2018-06-18 |
| 出版年 | 2018 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | The conduct of adjudication is often influenced by motions––requests made by litigants to modify the course of adjudication. The question studied in this article is why adjudication is designed so as to permit the use of motions. The answer developed is that litigants will naturally know a great deal about their specific matter, whereas a court will ordinarily know little except to the degree that the court has already invested effort to appreciate it. By giving litigants the right to bring motions, the judicial system leads litigants to efficiently provide information to courts that is relevant to the adjudicative process. |
| 主题 | Microeconomics ; Economics of Information ; Other ; Law and Economics |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w24703 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/582376 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Steven Shavell. The Rationale for Motions in the Design of Adjudication. 2018. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w24703.pdf（334KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Steven Shavell]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Steven Shavell]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Steven Shavell]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
