Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w25033 |
来源ID | Working Paper 25033 |
Policy Experimentation, Redistribution and Voting Rules | |
Renee Bowen; Vincent Anesi | |
发表日期 | 2018-09-17 |
出版年 | 2018 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We study optimal policy experimentation by a committee. We consider a dynamic bargaining game in which committee members choose either a risky reform or a safe alternative each period. When no redistribution is allowed the unique equilibrium outcome is generically inefficient. When redistribution is allowed (even small amounts), there always exists an equilibrium that supports optimal experimentation for any voting rule without veto players. With veto players, however, optimal policy experimentation is possible only with a sufficient amount of redistribution. We conclude that veto rights are more of an obstacle to optimal policy experimentation than constraints on redistribution. |
主题 | Microeconomics ; Game Theory ; Welfare and Collective Choice ; Public Economics ; National Fiscal Issues |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w25033 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/582707 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Renee Bowen,Vincent Anesi. Policy Experimentation, Redistribution and Voting Rules. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w25033.pdf(721KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Renee Bowen]的文章 |
[Vincent Anesi]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Renee Bowen]的文章 |
[Vincent Anesi]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Renee Bowen]的文章 |
[Vincent Anesi]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。