Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w25471 |
来源ID | Working Paper 25471 |
Measuring Productivity: Lessons from Tailored Surveys and Productivity Benchmarking | |
David Atkin; Amit Khandelwal; Adam Osman | |
发表日期 | 2019-01-21 |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We use tailored surveys and benchmarking in the flat-weave rug industry to better understand the shortcomings of standard productivity measures. TFPQ performs poorly because of variation in product specifications across firms. Controlling for specifications aligns TFPQ with lab benchmarks. We also collect quality metrics to construct quality productivity (the ability to produce quality given inputs) and find substantial dispersion across firms. This motivates interest in multi-dimensional productivity, or capability. As quality productivity is negatively correlated with TFPQ, TFPR may perform better at capturing capabilities in settings where better firms make products with more demanding specifications that have greater input requirements. |
主题 | Microeconomics ; Households and Firms ; International Economics |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w25471 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/583145 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | David Atkin,Amit Khandelwal,Adam Osman. Measuring Productivity: Lessons from Tailored Surveys and Productivity Benchmarking. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w25471.pdf(572KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。