Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w26038 |
来源ID | Working Paper 26038 |
Is Great Information Good Enough? Evidence from Physicians as Patients | |
Michael D. Frakes; Jonathan Gruber; Anupam Jena | |
发表日期 | 2019-07-08 |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Stemming from the belief that the key barrier to achieving high-quality and low-cost health care is the deficiency of information and medical knowledge among patients, an enormous number of health policies are focused on patient education. In this paper, we attempt to place an upper bound on the improvements to health care quality that may emanate from such information campaigns. To do so, we compare the care received by a group of patients that should have the best possible information on health care service efficacy—i.e., physicians as patients—with a comparable group of non-physician patients, taking various steps to account for unobservable differences between the two groups. Our results suggest that physicians do only slightly better in adhering to both low- and high-value care guidelines than non-physicians – but not by much and not always. |
主题 | Public Economics ; National Fiscal Issues ; Health, Education, and Welfare ; Health |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w26038 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/583712 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Michael D. Frakes,Jonathan Gruber,Anupam Jena. Is Great Information Good Enough? Evidence from Physicians as Patients. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w26038.pdf(363KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。