| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w26119 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 26119 |
| Projective Paternalism | |
| Sandro Ambuehl; B. Douglas Bernheim; Axel Ockenfels | |
| 发表日期 | 2019-07-29 |
| 出版年 | 2019 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | We study experimentally when, why, and how people intervene in others' choices. Choice Architects (CAs) construct opportunity sets containing bundles of time-indexed payments for Choosers. CAs frequently prevent impatient choices despite opportunities to provide advice, believing Choosers benefit. We consider several hypotheses concerning CAs' motives. A conventional behavioral welfarist acts as a correctly informed social planner; a mistakes-projective paternalist removes options she wishes she could reject when choosing for herself; an ideals-projective paternalist seeks to align others' choices with her own aspirations. Ideals-projective paternalism provides the best explanation for interventions in the laboratory and rationalizes support for actual paternalistic policies. |
| 主题 | Other ; Economic Systems |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w26119 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/583791 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Sandro Ambuehl,B. Douglas Bernheim,Axel Ockenfels. Projective Paternalism. 2019. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w26119.pdf（889KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
