Gateway to Think Tanks
| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w27659 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 27659 |
| Does FinTech Substitute for Banks? Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program | |
| Isil Erel; Jack Liebersohn | |
| 发表日期 | 2020-08-10 |
| 出版年 | 2020 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | New technology promises to expand the supply of financial services to small businesses poorly served by the banking system. Does it succeed? We study the response of FinTech to financial services demand created by the introduction of the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). We find that FinTech is disproportionately used in ZIP codes with fewer bank branches, lower incomes, and a larger minority share of the population, as well as in industries with little ex ante small-business lending. FinTech’s role in PPP provision is also greater in counties where the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic were more severe. We estimate that more PPP provision by traditional banks causes statistically significant but economically small substitution away from FinTechs, implying that FinTech mostly expands the overall supply of financial services, rather than redistributing it. |
| 主题 | Financial Economics ; Financial Institutions ; Public Economics ; Taxation ; COVID-19 |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w27659 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/585331 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Isil Erel,Jack Liebersohn. Does FinTech Substitute for Banks? Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program. 2020. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w27659.pdf(858KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Isil Erel]的文章 |
| [Jack Liebersohn]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Isil Erel]的文章 |
| [Jack Liebersohn]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Isil Erel]的文章 |
| [Jack Liebersohn]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。