| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w27849 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 27849 |
| Fifty Shades of QE: Comparing Findings of Central Bankers and Academics | |
| Brian Fabo; Martina Jančoková; Elisabeth Kempf; Ľuboš Pástor | |
| 发表日期 | 2020-09-28 |
| 出版年 | 2020 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | We compare the findings of central bank researchers and academic economists regarding the macroeconomic effects of quantitative easing (QE). We find that central bank papers find QE to be more effective than academic papers do. Central bank papers report larger effects of QE on output and inflation. They also report QE effects on output that are more significant, both statistically and economically, and they use more positive language in the abstract. Central bank researchers who report larger QE effects on output experience more favorable career outcomes. A survey of central banks reveals substantial involvement of bank management in research production. |
| 主题 | Other ; General, Teaching ; Macroeconomics ; Monetary Policy ; Financial Economics ; Financial Institutions |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w27849 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/585523 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Brian Fabo,Martina Jančoková,Elisabeth Kempf,et al. Fifty Shades of QE: Comparing Findings of Central Bankers and Academics. 2020. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w27849.pdf（455KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
