G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型报告
DOI10.3386/w28064
来源IDWorking Paper 28064
Choices and Outcomes in Assignment Mechanisms: The Allocation of Deceased Donor Kidneys
Nikhil Agarwal; Charles Hodgson; Paulo Somaini
发表日期2020-11-09
出版年2020
语种英语
摘要While the mechanism design paradigm emphasizes notions of efficiency based on agent preferences, policymakers often focus on alternative objectives. School districts emphasize educational achievement, and transplantation communities focus on patient survival. It is unclear whether choice-based mechanisms perform well when assessed based on these outcomes. This paper evaluates the assignment mechanism for allocating deceased donor kidneys on the basis of patient life-years from transplantation (LYFT). We examine the role of choice in increasing LYFT and compare equilibrium assignments to benchmarks that remove choice. Our model combines choices and outcomes in order to study how selection affects LYFT. We show how to identify and estimate the model using instruments derived from the mechanism. The estimates suggest that the design in use selects patients with better post-transplant survival prospects and matches them well, resulting in an average LYFT of 8.78, which is 0.92 years more than a random assignment. However, the maximum aggregate LYFT is 13.84. Realizing the majority of the gains requires transplanting relatively healthy patients, who would have longer life expectancies even without a transplant. Therefore, a policymaker faces a dilemma between transplanting patients who are sicker and those for whom life will be extended the longest.
主题Econometrics ; Estimation Methods ; Microeconomics ; Market Structure and Distribution ; Health, Education, and Welfare ; Health
URLhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w28064
来源智库National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/585737
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Nikhil Agarwal,Charles Hodgson,Paulo Somaini. Choices and Outcomes in Assignment Mechanisms: The Allocation of Deceased Donor Kidneys. 2020.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
w28064.pdf(903KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Nikhil Agarwal]的文章
[Charles Hodgson]的文章
[Paulo Somaini]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Nikhil Agarwal]的文章
[Charles Hodgson]的文章
[Paulo Somaini]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Nikhil Agarwal]的文章
[Charles Hodgson]的文章
[Paulo Somaini]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: w28064.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。