| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w28152 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 28152 |
| Lockdowns and Innovation: Evidence from the 1918 Flu Pandemic | |
| Enrico Berkes; Olivier Deschenes; Ruben Gaetani; Jeffrey Lin; Christopher Severen | |
| 发表日期 | 2020-11-30 |
| 出版年 | 2020 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Does social distancing harm innovation? We estimate the effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs)—policies that restrict interactions in an attempt to slow the spread of disease—on local invention. We construct a panel of issued patents and NPIs adopted by 50 large US cities during the 1918 flu pandemic. Difference-in-differences estimates show that cities adopting longer NPIs did not experience a decline in patenting during the pandemic relative to short-NPI cities, and recorded higher patenting afterward. Rather than reduce local invention by restricting localized knowledge spillovers, NPIs adopted during the pandemic may have better preserved other inventive factors. |
| 主题 | History ; Other History ; Development and Growth ; Innovation and R& ; D ; Regional and Urban Economics ; Regional Economics ; COVID-19 |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w28152 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/585826 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Enrico Berkes,Olivier Deschenes,Ruben Gaetani,et al. Lockdowns and Innovation: Evidence from the 1918 Flu Pandemic. 2020. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w28152.pdf（549KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
