Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w29417 |
来源ID | Working Paper 29417 |
One Instrument to Rule Them All: The Bias and Coverage of Just-ID IV | |
Joshua Angrist; Michal Kolesár | |
发表日期 | 2021-11-01 |
出版年 | 2021 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We revisit the finite-sample behavior of just-identified instrumental variables (IV) estimators, arguing that in most microeconometric applications, just-identified IV bias is negligible and the usual inference strategies likely reliable. Three widely-cited applications are used to explain why this is so. We then consider pretesting strategies of the form t₁ > c, where t₁ is the first-stage t-statistic, and the first-stage sign is given. Although pervasive in empirical practice, pretesting on the first-stage F-statistic exacerbates bias and distorts inference. We show, however, that median bias is both minimized and roughly halved by setting c = 0, that is by screening on the sign of the estimated first stage. This bias reduction is a free lunch: conventional confidence interval coverage is unchanged by screening on the estimated first-stage sign. To the extent that IV analysts sign-screen already, these results strengthen the case for a sanguine view of the finite-sample behavior of just-ID IV. |
主题 | Econometrics ; Estimation Methods ; Labor Economics |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w29417 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/587091 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Joshua Angrist,Michal Kolesár. One Instrument to Rule Them All: The Bias and Coverage of Just-ID IV. 2021. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w29417.pdf(573KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Joshua Angrist]的文章 |
[Michal Kolesár]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Joshua Angrist]的文章 |
[Michal Kolesár]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Joshua Angrist]的文章 |
[Michal Kolesár]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。