Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w30113 |
来源ID | Working Paper 30113 |
Who Benefits from Meritocracy? | |
Diana Moreira; Santiago Pérez | |
发表日期 | 2022-06-06 |
出版年 | 2022 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Does screening applicants using exams help or hurt the chances of lower-SES candidates? Because individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds fare, on average, worse than those from richer backgrounds in standardized tests, a common concern with this "meritocratic" approach is that it might have a negative impact on the opportunities of lower-SES individuals. However, an alternative view is that, even if such applicants underperformed on exams, other (potentially more discretionary and less impersonal) selection criteria might put them at an even worse disadvantage. We investigate this question using evidence from the 1883 Pendleton Act, a landmark reform in American history which introduced competitive exams to select certain federal employees. Using newly assembled data on the socioeconomic backgrounds of government employees and a difference-in-differences strategy, we find that, although the reform increased the representation of "educated outsiders" (individuals with high education but limited connections), it reduced the share of lower-SES individuals. This decline was driven by a higher representation of the middle class, with little change in the representation of upper-class applicants. The drop in the representation of lower-SES workers was stronger among applicants from states with more unequal access to schooling as well as in offices that relied more heavily on connections prior to the reform. These findings suggest that, although using exams could help select more qualified candidates, these improvements can come with the cost of increased elitism. |
主题 | Labor Economics ; Demography and Aging ; Unemployment and Immigration ; Other ; Accounting, Marketing, and Personnel ; History ; Financial History |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w30113 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/587785 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Diana Moreira,Santiago Pérez. Who Benefits from Meritocracy?. 2022. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w30113.pdf(508KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Diana Moreira]的文章 |
[Santiago Pérez]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Diana Moreira]的文章 |
[Santiago Pérez]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Diana Moreira]的文章 |
[Santiago Pérez]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。