Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
Do Discrete Choice Approaches to Valuing Urban Amenities Yield Different Results Than Hedonic Models? | |
Paramita Sinha; Martha Caulkins; Maureen L. Cropper | |
发表日期 | 2018-02-08 |
出版年 | 2018 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Valuing climate amenities using a discrete model of household location choice results in greater values for warmer winters and cooler summers than a hedonic model. |
主题 | Data and Decision Tools,Valuation |
URL | https://www.rff.org/publications/working-papers/do-discrete-choice-approaches-to-valuing-urban-amenities-yield-different-results-than-hedonic-models/ |
来源智库 | Resources for the Future (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/588070 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Paramita Sinha,Martha Caulkins,Maureen L. Cropper. Do Discrete Choice Approaches to Valuing Urban Amenities Yield Different Results Than Hedonic Models?. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RFF20WP2018-02.pdf(1108KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。