| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| Do Discrete Choice Approaches to Valuing Urban Amenities Yield Different Results Than Hedonic Models? | |
| Paramita Sinha; Martha Caulkins; Maureen L. Cropper | |
| 发表日期 | 2018-02-08 |
| 出版年 | 2018 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Valuing climate amenities using a discrete model of household location choice results in greater values for warmer winters and cooler summers than a hedonic model. |
| 主题 | Data and Decision Tools,Valuation |
| URL | https://www.rff.org/publications/working-papers/do-discrete-choice-approaches-to-valuing-urban-amenities-yield-different-results-than-hedonic-models/ |
| 来源智库 | Resources for the Future (United States) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/588070 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Paramita Sinha,Martha Caulkins,Maureen L. Cropper. Do Discrete Choice Approaches to Valuing Urban Amenities Yield Different Results Than Hedonic Models?. 2018. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| RFF20WP2018-02.pdf（1108KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
