| 来源类型 | Report |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| PHMSA’s 2015 Tank Car Rule: Should It Stay or Should It Go? | |
| Alan Krupnick; Justine Huetteman; Arthur G. Fraas | |
| 发表日期 | 2018-07-20 |
| 出版年 | 2018 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | As part of a series examining US oil and gas sector regulations, this report analyzes the costs and benefits of repealing or modifying a Department of Transportation rule to improve the safety of railroad tank cars carrying crude oil and ethanol. |
| 主题 | Oil,Benefit-Cost Analysis,Risk Analysis and Uncertainty,Electric Power |
| URL | https://www.rff.org/publications/reports/phmsas-2015-tank-car-rule-should-it-stay-or-should-it-go/ |
| 来源智库 | Resources for the Future (United States) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/588110 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Alan Krupnick,Justine Huetteman,Arthur G. Fraas. PHMSA’s 2015 Tank Car Rule: Should It Stay or Should It Go?. 2018. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| RFF20Rpt20Tank20Car2（502KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
| RFF20Rpt20tank20car2（70KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA |  浏览 | ||
| 文件名： | RFF20Rpt20tank20car20rule_0.2e16d0ba.fill-620x800.png |
| 格式： | image/png |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
