G2TT
来源类型Journal Article
规范类型论文
Flawed Analyses of US Auto Fuel Economy Standards
Antonio M. Bento; Kenneth Gillingham; Mark R. Jacobsen; Christopher R. Knittel; Benjamin Leard; Joshua Linn; Virginia McConnell; David Rapson; James M. Sallee; Arthur A. van Benthem; Kate S. Whitefoot
发表日期2018-12-07
出版年2018
语种英语
摘要Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions standards for passenger vehicles and light trucks have long been a centerpiece of the US strategy to reduce energy use and GHG emissions and increase energy security. Under the authority of the Energy Independence and Security Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) jointly set GHG and CAFE standards to reach 55 miles per gallon by 2025. A 2016 draft technical assessment report (TAR) affirmed by the EPA in January 2017 concluded that the 2022–2025 standards were technologically feasible and that benefits far exceeded costs. But under the current administration, those agencies are now challenging that conclusion in a 2018 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which proposes freezing standards at model year (MY) 2020 levels through 2025. Its analysis finds that the costs of the previous standards now exceed benefits. With the agencies currently in the process of determining whether the rule should be finalized, we describe how the 2018 analysis has fundamental flaws and inconsistences, is at odds with basic economic theory and empirical studies, is misleading, and does not improve estimates of costs and benefits of fuel economy standards beyond those in the 2016 analysis.
主题CAFE Standards and Fuel Efficiency,Policy Design and Evaluation,Transportation
URLhttps://www.rff.org/publications/journal-articles/flawed-analyses-us-auto-fuel-economy-standards/
来源智库Resources for the Future (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/588137
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Antonio M. Bento,Kenneth Gillingham,Mark R. Jacobsen,et al. Flawed Analyses of US Auto Fuel Economy Standards. 2018.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Antonio M. Bento]的文章
[Kenneth Gillingham]的文章
[Mark R. Jacobsen]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Antonio M. Bento]的文章
[Kenneth Gillingham]的文章
[Mark R. Jacobsen]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Antonio M. Bento]的文章
[Kenneth Gillingham]的文章
[Mark R. Jacobsen]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。