Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Journal Article in Science Advances |
规范类型 | 论文 |
Forests: Carbon Sequestration, Biomass Energy, or Both? | |
Brent Sohngen | |
发表日期 | 2020-03-25 |
出处 | Science Advances |
出版年 | 2020 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | There is a continuing debate over the role that woody bioenergy plays in climate mitigation. This paper clarifies this controversy and illustrates the impacts of woody biomass demand on forest harvests, prices, timber management investments and intensity, forest area, and the resulting carbon balance under different climate mitigation policies. Increased bioenergy demand increases forest carbon stocks thanks to afforestation activities and more intensive management relative to a no-bioenergy case. Some natural forests, however, are converted to more intensive management, with potential biodiversity losses. Incentivizing both wood-based bioenergy and forest sequestration could increase carbon sequestration and conserve natural forests simultaneously. We conclude that the expanded use of wood for bioenergy will result in net carbon benefits, but an efficient policy also needs to regulate forest carbon sequestration. |
主题 | Land Use, Forestry, and Agriculture,Carbon Sinks |
URL | https://www.rff.org/publications/journal-articles/forests-carbon-sequestration-biomass-energy-or-both/ |
来源智库 | Resources for the Future (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/588288 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Brent Sohngen. Forests: Carbon Sequestration, Biomass Energy, or Both?. 2020. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Brent Sohngen]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Brent Sohngen]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Brent Sohngen]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。