Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Commentary |
规范类型 | 评论 |
Why EU just transition cash needs to match climate ambition | |
Rebekka Popp | |
发表日期 | 2020-11-25 |
出版年 | 2020 |
语种 | 英语 |
正文 | As the European Parliament and Council thrash out the details of the Just Transition Fund, they need to make sure the fund helps deliver on 55% emissions cuts by 2030 and doesn’t simply support business as usual. The Just Transition Fund was initially proposed by EU Commission President von der Leyen in July 2019 to bring onside countries like Poland and Czechia that were reluctant to sign up to the EU target of climate neutrality by 2050 the latest. But the debate has since moved on. Other large economies like China, Japan and now the US are pledging to bring emissions down to zero within the next thirty to forty years, kicking-off a race for faster and deeper emissions cuts. The EU is also planning to increase its climate action over the next decade. There is broad support from member states for the Commission’s latest proposal to up the EU climate target for 2030 from 40% to at least 55% emissions reductions. The European Parliament is even pressing for emissions cuts of 60%. The Commission is also doubling down on its efforts to implement the European Green Deal and has announced a packed policy and legislative agenda for 2021 to deliver this new ambition. The Just Transition Fund will need to play a central role in this endeavour, but if the Council and Parliament don’t attach enough climate conditions to it, the fund risks becoming a stumbling block, rather than a solution, to rapid emissions reductions. Despite not having yet been agreed, the fund has already made a difference by starting or speeding up transition planning in coal regions like the Polish Eastern Wielkopolska region or the Romanian Jiu Valley because member states must submit regional transition plans to access funding. But it is not enough that these strategies are in line with existing national energy and climate plans since these are only designed to reach 40% greenhouse gases cuts by 2030. A new 2030 target of at least 55%, which should be agreed by the end of the year, will mean that all countries will have to step up climate action immediately including putting coal on a fast retirement track. The Just Transition Fund can support member states in clearing the last hurdles on the way to transitioning to cleaner sources of energy. But this also means the fund should not be used to extend the lifetime of a dying coal industry or build-up new fossil gas infrastructure as first leaks of transition strategies suggest. Three things lawmakers and member states need to get rightThe European Parliament, Council and Commission are expected to agree on the final rules for allocating the Just Transition Fund by the end of the year. EU lawmakers have called for a bigger pot of money and for the scope of the fund to be broadened. More important, however, is good use of existing funding which can be ensured by:
![]()
By incentivising climate action instead of rewarding laggards, the Just Transition Fund can help remaining coal countries catch up with the rest of the EU and ditch fossil fuels in favour of renewables. If used to overcome social and political obstacles to the transition, the fund can ensure the EU as a whole benefits from the European Green Deal and put 55% or even deeper emissions cuts within reach. |
URL | https://www.e3g.org/news/why-eu-just-transition-cash-needs-to-match-climate-ambition/ |
来源智库 | Third Generation Environmentalism (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/591116 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Rebekka Popp. Why EU just transition cash needs to match climate ambition. 2020. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Rebekka Popp]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Rebekka Popp]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Rebekka Popp]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。