G2TT
来源类型CEPS Policy Briefs
规范类型简报
The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine: A Cost-Benefit Analysis
Elena Gnedina; Michael Emerson
发表日期2009-01-19
出版年2009
语种英语
摘要

The January 2009 interruptions of gas supplies from Russia to the EU via Ukraine, following the earlier 2006 crisis, has confirmed the absolutely intolerable situation in which a commodity of strategic importance for European industry and households has become uncertain and erratic, in breach of long-term supply contracts, as a result of disorderly commercial and political relations between Russia and Ukraine.
The recently agreed tri-partite (EU, Russia, Ukraine) monitoring system is a positive step, even if at the time of writing supplies have not yet resumed. But in any case this can be viewed as no more than a stop-gap measure. A more fundamental and permanent solution is required. For this purpose the authors propose that the EU, Russia and Ukraine negotiate the creation of a new business consortium to be granted a long-term concession to operate the Ukraine trunk gas transit pipeline.

主题Europe in the World
URLhttps://www.ceps.eu/publications/case-gas-transit-consortium-ukraine-cost-benefit-analysis
来源智库Centre for European Policy Studies (Belgium)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/62260
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Elena Gnedina,Michael Emerson. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. 2009.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
1782.pdf(281KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Elena Gnedina]的文章
[Michael Emerson]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Elena Gnedina]的文章
[Michael Emerson]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Elena Gnedina]的文章
[Michael Emerson]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 1782.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。