| 来源类型 | Publication |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| Is it Gender, Religion or Both? A Role Congruity Theory of Candidate Electability in Transitional Tunisia | |
| Lindsay J. Benstead | |
| 发表日期 | 2015-03-06 |
| 出版年 | 2015 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | by Lindsay J. Benstead, Amaney A. Jamal and Ellen Lust Do voters regard male and female candidates equally? Does the apparent religiosity of candidates help or hurt their electoral chances? Where biases exist, what explains them? In this study, respondents were presented with photos of a secular-appearing male and female candidate or a religious-appearing male and female candidate and asked to rate their willingness to vote for them. The results were published in March 2015 edition of Perspective on Politics. Click her for the article summary, “Why Tunisians (don’t) vote for women,” published by The Washington Post "Monkey Cage." |
| 主题 | Women's Rights in the Middle East |
| URL | https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/it-gender-religion-or-both-role-congruity-theory-candidate-electability-transitional-tunisia/ |
| 来源智库 | James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy (United States) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/79380 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Lindsay J. Benstead . Is it Gender, Religion or Both? A Role Congruity Theory of Candidate Electability in Transitional Tunisia. 2015. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Lindsay J. Benstead ]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Lindsay J. Benstead ]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Lindsay J. Benstead ]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
