G2TT
来源类型Articles
规范类型论文
DOI10.1016/j.agsy.2009.10.001
ISSN0308-521X
The diversity of rural livelihoods and their influence on soil fertility in agricultural systems of East Africa – A typology of smallholder farms
Achten, W.M.J.; Maes, W.H.; Aerts, R.; Verchot, L.V.; Trabucco, A.; Mathijs, E.; Singh, V.P.; Muys, B.
发表日期2010
出处Agricultural Systems 103(2): 83-97
出版年2010
语种英语
摘要

Technological interventions to address the problem of poor productivity of smallholder agricultural systems must be designed to target socially diverse and spatially heterogeneous farms and farming systems. This paper proposes a categorisation of household diversity based on a functional typology of livelihood strategies, and analyses the influence of such diversity on current soil fertility status and spatial variability on a sample of 250 randomly selected farms from six districts of Kenya and Uganda. In spite of the agro-ecological and socio-economic diversity observed across the region (e.g. 4 months year-1 of food self-sufficiency in Vihiga, Kenya vs. 10 in Tororo, Uganda) consistent patterns of variability were also observed. For example, all the households with less than 3 months year-1 of food self-sufficiency had a land:labour ratio (LLR) < 1, and all those with LLR > 1 produced enough food to cover their diet for at least 5 months. Households with LLR < 1 were also those who generated more than 50% of their total income outside the farm. Dependence on off/non-farm income was one of the main factors associated with household diversity. Based on indicators of resource endowment and income strategies and using principal component analysis, farmers’ rankings and cluster analysis the 250 households surveyed were grouped into five farm types: (1) Farms that rely mainly on permanent off-farm employment (from 10 to 28% of the farmers interviewed, according to site); (2) larger, wealthier farms growing cash crops (8–20%); (3) medium resource endowment, food self-sufficient farms (20–38%); (4) medium to low resource endowment relying partly on non-farm activities (18–30%); and (5) poor households with family members employed locally as agricultural labourers by wealthier farmers (13–25%). Due to differential soil management over long periods of time, and to ample diversity in resource endowments (land, livestock, labour) and access to cash, the five farm types exhibited different soil carbon and nutrient stocks (e.g. Type 2 farms had average C, N, P and K stocks that were 2–3 times larger than for Types 4 or 5). In general, soil spatial variability was larger in farms (and sites) with poorer soils and smaller in farms owning livestock. The five farm types identified may be seen as domains to target technological innovations and/or development efforts.

主题farming systems ; soil fertility ; integrated systems ; agricultural development
URLhttps://www.cifor.org/library/2901/
来源智库Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/91539
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Achten, W.M.J.,Maes, W.H.,Aerts, R.,等. The diversity of rural livelihoods and their influence on soil fertility in agricultural systems of East Africa – A typology of smallholder farms. 2010.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
0308521X.jpg(10KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Achten, W.M.J.]的文章
[Maes, W.H.]的文章
[Aerts, R.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Achten, W.M.J.]的文章
[Maes, W.H.]的文章
[Aerts, R.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Achten, W.M.J.]的文章
[Maes, W.H.]的文章
[Aerts, R.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 0308521X.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。